>Data set protection alone isn't granular enough. >It's all or nothing for update access and this change allows more granular >control.
Yes, you're right it is simple, but (personal attacks aside) why is this needed? Are we going to be changing the roles of SYSPROGs so that one does a RECEIVE, one does an APPLY, etc? That kind of granularity is required? - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
