>From my perspective, I have DBAs and Programmers that want to know what is currently installed. Currently they have to contact me and make a request, I then pull the SMP List, MCS and Applied information for them.
If they had LIST capabilities ONLY, then I could can a job for them to run and they could then review the material. It will reduce the amount of questions like - IS THIS ON YET? And not just for IBM fixes, but for any OEM product that uses SMP/E. Lizette > Ted MacNEIL Wrote: > > >Data set protection alone isn't granular enough. > > >It's all or nothing for update access and this change allows more > granular control. > > Yes, you're right it is simple, but (personal attacks aside) why is > this needed? > > Are we going to be changing the roles of SYSPROGs so that one does a > RECEIVE, one does an APPLY, etc? > > That kind of granularity is required? > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
