On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:30:17 +0200, R.S. wrote: > >My understanding is the same, however I disagree with the secon >sentence. IMHO if any unauthorized program is able to escalate its >privileges then integrity APAR should be issued for *operating system*, >not the program itself. Otherwise you don't try to fix security hole, >you only try to stop (one of) the hole explorers. I smell Windows... ;-) > I stand corrected.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
