On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:41:32 -0500, Tony @ Comcast <[email protected]> wrote:

>Years ago I worked for a small MVS shop that functioned quite well using the
>"catalog name being the same as the hlq" trick to avoid the need for
>creating aliases en masse.  It was handy for the TSO user population to have
>a catalog called ISPF, the prefixing everyone's personal datasets
>accordingly.
>
>If I were in the storage management business these days (glad I'm not!) I'd
>continue to exploit this "feature."
>


The biggest problem I see with this is security.  Unless the security admin
still defined ISPF.userid.* profiles for each new user (or whatever profile
matched the personal data set naming convention.

Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS       
mailto:[email protected]                                          
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html 
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to