>If the sysprog is out of the loop then an IEFUSI,SMF parm or JES limit will
>bring them
automaticly in the loop.
...
Horse?
Barn door?
>So this just help to force the sysprog as a partner.
...
Buzzzzz! Wrong answer!
Thank you for playing.
This is an approach to a disaster.
NOT, a sound business tactic.
>Haven't seen any sysprog refusing requests to change limits if they understand
>the issue
and the reason.
...
'Because' isn't good enough?
(8-{]}
I've seen many a stubborn SYSPROG refuse to implement, because they were
f***ing with 'MY SYSTEM'.
The point is we have to move from restricting to empowering.
I have seen so many processes put in place to slow down the rate of change.
This is a dichotamy (I know I didn't spell that correctly), because the number
one purpose of IT is to facilitate change!
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edwards Deming
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
