>One problem with X is that some installations may have had a procedure named X >that was not trivial and did real, useful, productive work.
Since every shop I've worked in (starting in 1981) had X as DEALLOC clone, why would any SYSPROG allow a 'productive' X, when it's a de facto standard for ops to use after a vary? And, I'm not talking about just my experience, but that of those who have come in from somewhere else. - I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation! Kimota! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
