Out of curiosity, what's the issue(s) with Tivoli? I'm familiar with all of CA's and Tivoli's products.
zNorman -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Dover Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 Monday 5:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: CA ESP Workload Automation On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:37:04 -0500, gsg <gsg_...@yahoo.com> wrote: >Does anyone use a CA job scheduler product called ESP Workload Automation? > >PROS/CONS compared to other job schedulers? > >TIA > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html Worked at a company previously that used ESP, before CA bought the product. I found it to be a very user friendly, reliable product. Cybermation, the original developer, was a little player in a big market. We had used another scheduling product that had been bought by CA and was being phased out. Our schedulers tried every scheduling product over a long (9 months I think) time and ESP was the clear winner. I am using Tivoli now and wish we could convert to ESP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
