On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:10:39 -0500, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:55:08 -0500, Etienne Thijsse wrote: >> >>Does anybody know why I don't see the second job in SDSF/ST ? Or, > >I wondered that once, and was fed some alphabet soup; perhaps >JOE vs. ???. > Thank you, at least I now know its not because of some SDSF setting or option I don't know about ... >>alternatively, does anyone know how I can have the child process put its >>output within the parents job output, so I can see it when I select the parent >>job in SDSF/ST ? >> >Not easily. I think Ed J. once said that (E)JES will do that for you. > >Alternatively, you could create some pipes before the fork; let the >child write to the pipes instead of to SYSOUT, and let the parent >job ATTACH tasks (IEBGENER would do) to copy the pipes to SYSOUT. >(I said it's not easy.) > That could be an option, I'll think about that... >Wouldn't it be great if SDSF grouped SYSOUT according to PGID? > Yes, it would :-) Thanks, Etienne ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
