On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Barbara Nitz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>Yes, this is the JCL I found, but this only targets some PSA areas and
>>not with x'FF' and x'4F' as you said.
> The FF and 4F come from the DIAG traps. And I think I copied the JCL from
> share presentation 'bit bucket 29'. And believe me, when I saw a PSA
>
>>Furthermore, the mentioned traps are not in my Inititalization and
>>Tuning Reference, nor can I find them with IBM. Where did you get this
>>wisdom?
> Of course they're not documented!!!! (One of Ed Jaffes pet peeves...) Look
> for 'dirty getmain' in the archives. A lot of those diag traps were at one 
> time or
> another mentioned in other bit buckets. And were discussed at ibm-main.
>
> I tend to keep these things in a folder, to be whipped out later. Once you set
> them via DIAG, 'D DIAG' dutifully shows them!
>
> But officially they're 'unsupported'. Which is why I said to use a test 
> system to
> try. Which is why it is so easy for vendors (like Beta Systems) to refuse to 
> fix
> things uncovered by those traps. And if someone has the bug and did not
> have the traps on, the problem is most likely not reproducible and hence will
> not get fixed, because the 'right' doc isn't there.
> Barbara
>
How about putting these settings in a Informational APAR II##### as a
suggested debugging technique?

-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to