Many repliers have emphasized clarity and precision.  Although Mr. Gilmore's 
word choice is sometimes arcane and obscure, nevertheless his words under 
attack were not "big" or "complex" words; e.g., "ætat", having only five 
letters, cannot possibly be characterized as "big", and its meaning is 
instantly obvious given a knowledge of Latin roots, as was "lacunae", also not 
a "big" word.  Nor did he describe the OP as "naïve."  He said that the OP was 
"a naïf."  These two words are not synonymous.  Naïve is an adjective and naïf 
is a noun, as he used it.  If you take Mr. Gilmore to task for lack of clarity 
and precision, then please be sure that your post is just as clear and precise 
as you wish his had been.  Were it not for Mr. Gilmore's predilection for 
precise meanings, I would still be ignorant of the words "antipode" and 
"boustrophedon" (the latter of which is big, complex, and arcane, but amazingly 
precise).  As I also do not have an OED on my shelf, he often drives me h!
 appily to an online English dictionary, into a word's etymology, and from 
thence to further French, Greek, Italian, or even Icelandic dabbling.

Bill Fairchild
Rocket Software

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 2:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ATTACH

>There's a lot to be said for vocabulary enhancement.

Yes, but there is a lot to be said for communicating.

>I'm tired of hearing that everything must be written for a 5th grade level 
>audience.

There's a reason for that. Most people are lucky if they can read at that high 
of a level.

>What ever happened to 'look it up'?

That's fine in the classroom;difficult in real life.

The whole purpose of communicating is to communicate!
If your reader doesn't understand you, through the uses/abuse of large/obscure 
words or complex phraseology, it is not the reader's fault.
It is the fault of the writer.

And, using those big words to answer the OP, did not solve the problem.
The calling of him naive was also insulting.
Just because somebody is a novice, is no reason to talk down to him.
If I had answers, I would have responded.



----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to