On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:56:12 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
>
>> Nor did he describe the OP as "naïve." He said that the OP was
>> "a naïf."
>
>No. He said: "They are radically naif.", speaking of the OP's
>questions.
>
> > These two words are not synonymous. Naïve is an adjective
> > and naïf is a noun, as he used it.
>
>No. He used "naif" as an adjective, and did not include the
>diaeresis. The Merriam-Webster online dictionary says:
>
>Definition of NAÏF: naive
>
>Variants of NAÏF
> na·ïf
> na·if
>
Pardon my French, but is this merely a distinction of
gender (and typography)? Google tells me for:
she is naive; he is naive
qu'elle est naïve, il est naïf
And no one has until now taken Mr. Gilmore to task for
disingenuously (in my perception) pouncing upon Sam Siegel's
typo. I suppose there must be a (self-appointed) enforcer
of Muphry's Law.
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
