That is true. If I can not be sure about a specific track I will take the
worse case. That can be until one cylinder.
The simulator is many thousands of code and I made it the best and the
efficient I can.

Good point Bill.

Shai

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Bill Fairchild <[email protected]> wrote:

> Shai has said that he understands what the Read Count, Search Key Equal,
> TIC *-16 loop is doing.  His problem is that when simulating how that
> sequence works, he cannot know, without also reading the tracks involved
> (which for performance reasons he doesn't want to do) which track, if any,
> has the key that will cause the loop to end, which will then presumably be
> the only track in the range of tracks being searched that will be accessed
> by a write command coming after the search/TIC pair.  Thus he cannot know
> which track to replicate.  One way to solve this problem is to replicate all
> the tracks within the range being searched, which will depend on whether the
> chain is operating in CKD or ECKD mode and also on the current file mask.
>
> When in CKD mode, the maximum number of tracks that can be in a multi-track
> search operation is however many tracks constitute one full cylinder.  When
> in ECKD mode, the maximum number of tracks that can be accessed in any
> multi-track operation is always two, the track where the operation begins
> and one track beyond that.  In all these cases, if the search fails after
> accessing all possible tracks in the range allowed, the channel program will
> end with a Record Not Found error, which may then cause the operating system
> to redrive the channel program on a new cylinder or a new range of tracks.
>  Presumably his code would also intercept such a redrive operation with the
> new range of tracks visible.
>
> The problem here is that a very large number of tracks may have to be
> searched before the search command is successful, and he doesn't want to
> have to replicate any more tracks than have really been changed by a write
> command coming immediately after the Search/TIC.  A real DASD will never
> have more than one track written to, but Shai's difficulty lies in knowing
> which one track to replicate.
>
> Bill Fairchild
> Rocket Software
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 7:33 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: The replication feature.
>
> On real hardware, the READ_COUNT will give you the address of the record
> whose key is being compared by the next CCW. It's a sequence that is
> heavily used in searches of non-indexed VTOCs.
>
> Rick
> ------------------------------------------
> shai hess wrote:
>
> >Yes, I know it and I support it.
> >But be aware that I can not see the result of the READ_COUNT because I
> take
> >control before the IO is really done to the real device.
> >
> >Shai
> >
> >On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Rick Fochtman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
>
> >>---------------------------------------<snip>-----------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >>A few words on replication.
> >>
> >>
> >>>The standard replication is sending CCWS to all controller which
> >>>have mirrors disks. Sometime controller send data to other controller to
> >>>sync the data between all of them.
> >>>In this process each controller emulates the CCWS and by that create the
> >>>same data as the source disk. In this case the search key is very easy
> to
> >>>implement.
> >>>
> >>>MFNetDisk because of the slow media of TCP do something else. It is
> >>>analyze
> >>>the CCW in memory without accessing the source disk data. That is why it
> >>>is
> >>>hard to process the search key without access the data in the disk.
> After
> >>>process the CCW it is decide what tracks need to be ReSync in the
> mirrors
> >>>of
> >>>the source disks. This process is complicate process especially for
> search
> >>>key CCW. Using this processing, MFNetDisk never block the real disk but
> >>>the
> >>>minus is that this is ASync processing meaning that if there is crash in
> >>>MF,
> >>>the mirror may be not fully Sync with the source disk. the MFNetDisk
> >>>replication can be good if you want to create Sync point or backup of
> the
> >>>real disk in specific time where you can validate that the process of
> >>>ReSync
> >>>is done completely without updating the source disks for short time
> until
> >>>the ReSync is totally over. This is called Sync Point where the mirrors
> is
> >>>fully Sync with the real disk.
> >>>
> >>>About the MFNetDisk emulation. Each CCW is sent to the PC which access
> the
> >>>data in the emulate disks and easily can process any CCW include serach
> >>>key
> >>>and all other CCWS.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
> >>-------------------------------------------<unsnip>-------------------------------------
> >>Shai, it's entirely acceptyable to use a READ COUNT CCW before the SEARCH
> >>KEY HIGH-OR-EQUAL CCW.
> >>
> >>READ COUNT
> >>SEARCH KEY HIGH-OR-EQUAL
> >>TIC *-16 (Back to the READ COUNT
> >>READY DATA (or WRITE DATA, as needed)
> >>
> >>Rick
> >>
> >>
> >>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >>send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> >>Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> >.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to