In <[email protected]>, on 12/04/2010
at 07:30 AM, John McKown <[email protected]> said:
>Anyway, I have access to a Windows server system.
Bletch!
>Granted, it is a bit of a bother to have to type stuff in.
If it's based on existing documentation, then you just need to modify
the markup, not retype the whole thing.
>They have said that it is just too different from MS Word
I.e., it works.
>MS Word is universal
Every time someone says "I don't believe in theories," another theory
dies.
>So learning to maintain a Wiki article is not marketable.
I suspect that wiki is becoming more prevalent than m$ word, if it's
not there already.
>Am I insane to want to use a Wiki for this sort of thing __instead__
>of a Word processor?
Are you asking about the politics or the technology? Technically, wiki
makes more sense than m$ word.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
