On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:46:16 -0600, Hank Medler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>->For years, JES2 wouldn't release spool space allocated to a given job
>->until all of the job was purged - i.e. freeing SPOOL space seemed to be
>->an all-or-nothing proposition.  I learned today that JES2 frees up
>->SPOOL space for spin-OFF SYSOUT data sets (FREE=CLOSE) as soon as
>->they're printed or purged, i.e. JES2 no longer waits for the entire job
>->to get purged in order to free up some of the space allocated to it.
>->Apparently, this isn't something new at all: a quick test on my RESCUE
>->system shows that JES2 already behaved like that on MVS/ESA 5.2.2.
>->When did JES2 start freeing SPOOL space for spin-off data sets?  Am I
>->confused again?  Thanks.
>
>Gilbert,
>
>I am not entirely sure on this, but functionality for all JES2 SYSOUTs
>seems to have changed with our latest upgrade to z/OS 1.6 (at least this is
>when I started noticing). It appears that the SYSOUT (even without
>FREE=CLOSE) remain independent of each other within the Outgroup number
>groupings and allow rerouting of segments within an OUTGRP to separate
>destinations, classes, etc. For instance, if you run a simple IEBGENER and
>have your SYSUT2 route to the same OUTGRP as your MSGCLASS going to the
>held queue, you can enter the held queue of SDSF, type a '?' next to the
>output, and change it whichever class or destination you like. When you
>perform this, the OUTGRP number gets reassigned for the entry to the next
>sequential number. I believe this new (new to me anyway) ability to
>separate the SYSOUT and keep them independent is what allows JES2 to now
>free up space. If you purge this output from the queue, you should notice
>the space is cleared. As I recall, the SYSOUTs coded with FREE=CLOSE were
>always assigned their own exclusive OUTGRP number and thus space was freed
>when they were purged or printed. I could be wrong there though. When I
>started noticing this behavior recently, I thought I was going crazy and
>wondered if it was always like this. Hope this helps...
>
>Thanks,
>Hank Medler
>

Hate to reply to myself, but I was wrong and it appears that the space is
truly only freed when a SYSOUT is coded as FREE=CLOSE. Sorry, but even
though it separates the output to another entry, the space is not freed
when purging or printing the output of a non-FREE=CLOSE SYSOUT. Sorry, but
I can't aid any help on the historic beginnings of freeing space on spin-
off datasets... I haven't been around that long.

Thanks,
Hank Medler

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to