>From personal experience here: Our z/OS network person campaigned for "no 
>outbound connections" (other than whitelisted) because he knows that the 
>majority of the corporate information resides on the z/OS system. So he felt 
>this was a good security thing. But then we allow anybody to do an ftp client 
>connection from their desktop to z/OS and that kills the reason. My 
>orientation is like the RACF group says: Secure the data using RACF rules. 
>Don't depend on a secure channel to protect the data (except in flight - but 
>we don't encrypt on the internal LAN).

John McKown 

Systems Engineer IV

IT

 

Administrative Services Group

 

HealthMarkets(r)

 

9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010

(817) 255-3225 phone * 

john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com

 

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or 
proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact 
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 
HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the 
insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance 
Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The 
MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 5:38 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Fear the Internet, was Cool Things You Can Do in z/OS
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
> > Behalf Of Dick Bond
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 3:19 PM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> > Subject: Re: Cool Things You Can Do in z/OS
> > 
> > That's a couple of big "ifs" - that's why we can't use it.  Our
> workstation IP
> > addresses, even if fixed (like mine - most are not), cannot be
> accessed from
> > z/OS.  I would think most real-world shops are that way - if not,
> well, they
> > may need to hire some networking personnel to setup proper security.
> > 
> 
>   I am curious, why do some of the powers that be fear 
> connecting their
> mainframe to the network. With proper vpn, there should be no 
> reason to
> block z/OS from reaching out to users work stations. I wouldn't even
> insist on vpn if WSA would do SSL or SSH tunneling. And 
> presumably much
> of this traffic would be on an intranet, not the wild and wooly
> Internet.
>   There is no fear of virii, well maybe an application in java, but
> certainly not the system. Properly secured, a user can get 
> anywhere they
> don't belong not matter what port or door they come in on.
> 
>   I'd truly hate the (IMO unneeded) extra steps to do 
> Shopzseries or CA
> MSM without direct connection to IBM and CA's sites. 
> 
>   Is there a real reason, not PHB paranoia that I'm missing?
> 
> Dave Gibney
> Information Technology Services
> Washington State University
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> 
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to