In <listserv%[email protected]>, on 05/06/2011
at 08:55 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:
>Now, that's terse enough to be remniscent of Shmuel; and misleading
>to boot. Assuming I understand Chris's explanation, that is shameful
>pedantry.
There seems to be a tradition of labelling any response that you don't
understand as pedantry. Doping so, IMHO, is what is shameful.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
