In <listserv%[email protected]>, on 05/16/2011
at 12:17 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:
>Because you trimmed the essence of my remark,
I quoted the part that I was challenging.
>then disputed what remained out of context.
Context is not always relevant. I was challenging the claim "It allows
function reference before definition, so a typo in a function name
would cause the interpreter to swallow all input looking for the
definition." I don't see how anything prior to the comma changes the
claim after the comma.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
