Good news! The problem wasn't in vendor code, but in our "we know what we
typed" midndset, we made a typo in one of the files' alias definitions and
transposed a couple characters. We looked at this several times, but only
saw what we wanted to see. It took a pair of fresh, unknowing eyes to pick
it up.

"The system should have known what we wanted!"

Thanks for all the input here - I will store this away for future reference!
Have a great morning, afternoon, or evening whereever you are!
*don*

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Binyamin Dissen
<[email protected]>wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:23:06 -0400 Lizette Koehler <[email protected]
> >
> wrote:
>
> :>> >  >Hi friends!
> :>> > >Can anyone suggest a reason why a job runs fine with APF authorized
> :>> > loadlibs
> :>> > >when the actual files are used, but fails as unauthorized when using
> :>> > >a dataset alias? APF shows the correct file on the correct volume,
> :>> > >and I
> :>> > know
> :>> > >that I do not need to add the alias name to APF list, right? What
> :>> > >other things can I check, and is there a way for a file to lose APF
> :>> > >when using
> :>> > an
> :>> > >alias?
>
> :>> > >My understanding is that the Alias is only used to locate the "real"
> :>> > >file from the catalog, but then when it is opened, the "real" file
> is
> :>used.
>
> :>> > >Thanks in advance for your thoughts and help!
> :>> > >*don*
>
> :>Don I will agree with what others have stated.
>
> :>If it is an APF issue, you should see system abends like S106 or S047.
>  If
> :>your application is producing an error message then it is very likely it
> is
> :>the application and the way it is doing its function.
>
> I would have to disagree.
>
> Much code does a TESTAUTH FCTN=1 with a graceful exit / different
> processing
> if not APF.
>
> :>You should have the owner of the code explain how this error message is
> :>being produced.
>
> --
> Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]>
> http://www.dissensoftware.com
>
> Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
>
>
> Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
> you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
>
> I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
> especially those from irresponsible companies.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to