> if he doesn't mind, I'd like to use Simplist as a good example of the proper 
> way to write an ISPF application.

Lindy, I don't mind at all. Please feel free to do that any time you want!    
;-)

Thanks,
 
Dave Salt

SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it! 

http://www.mackinney.com/products/program-development/simplist.html  







> Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:06:16 +0200
> From: lindy.mayfi...@ssf.sas.com
> Subject: Re: When is performance really an issue? Was: Running an ISPF 
> applicction from one pds
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> 
> That is a good point, Ed, and I appreciate it.  And if he doesn't mind, I'd 
> like to use Simplist as a good example of the proper way to write an ISPF 
> application.   It is all developed the "right" way. No shortcuts  like I was 
> asking about.  And nobody dare update his libraries.
> 
> I mean, a module called a bazillion times an hour isn't the same as any 
> complex ISPF app.  Or is it?  I don't know.  I really don't know, that's why 
> I asked.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf 
> Of Ed Gould
> Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 3:11 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: When is performance really an issue? Was: Running an ISPF 
> applicction from one pds
> 
> Lindy,
> I had decided to stay out of this, until you spoke. Now I am just going to 
> say be very careful about the one ds idea. I am talking about mixing of 
> libraries. This might be idea for a testing environment but a production 
> environment can be a ball of worms. This becomes a very challenging as to who 
> updates what and when. If you have one person that's one thing but when you 
> have multiple people it can become nightmare. At one place we had a horror 
> story that can be best described as how to get moral down to zero. We had 
> many sysprogs updating the same ispf libraries and we had chaos.Talk about 
> finger pointing. I had to step in and change the process and eliminate the 
> problem by separating libraries and who could update what. The guys disliked 
> it but came around after a few months no more complaining and no finger 
> pointing.
> 
> Ed
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
                                          
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to