The problem is
1. There is no such thing as a ICF DB2 Catalog
In ICF it is simply "Catalog" mignt be used for
none, part of or all of DB2 objects in a sub-system
2. In DB2 there is no STRNO
Hence is the user talking about
STRNO for DB2 Catalog VSAM datasets in the ICF Catalog
Seems like a reasonable confusion to me
So the question should be
"Are there any special performance considerations for STRNO for the ICF
catalog that contains DB2 objects?"
he answer being No, The same considerations that apply to managing ICF
catalogs for anything apply to an ICF catalog that manages some DB2
objects? The answer is no.
A bit of additional information for a single DB2 subsystem, DB2 database
objects are rarely allocated, and rarely go through o/c/e When it does
happen the request comes from a single address space / tcb called DBM1
The above discussion might exclude Object define, delete and some stand
alone DB2 utilities.
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:46:12 +0100, R.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Avram Friedman wrote:
>
>> I am a bit confused.
>>
>> Dose the term 'DB2 catalog' in the original posting refer to
>> the ICF catalog that points to data sets of any type
>> or the special set of objects in DB2 that contains DB2 system
information.
>>
>> I fankly assumed it was the second case ...
>
>IMHO bad assumption. Topic keyword STRNO suggests ICF.
>
>
>--
>Radoslaw Skorupka
>Lodz, Poland
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
>Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
