On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:46:06 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote: >On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:40:01 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > >The difference is much more than a difference between LINK and ATTACH, gil. >Part of the difference is the parameter list, too. > >>And "a unique argument list format" has always baffled me. What ever >>was wrong with R1 pointing to a vector of addresses of argument >>strings? > >CMD is used for attaching TSO commands, which expect a different parameter >list than the standard linkage used by, e.g., EXEC PGM= (which is what ISPF >uses for PGM). > The question remains, what's wrong with the standard [OS/360] linkage used by, e.g., EXEC PGM=?
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
