In <1317603333203761.wa.paulgboulderaim....@bama.ua.edu>, on
07/25/2011
   at 09:40 AM, Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com> said:

>Clear enough if I read it carefully, but I dislike the user interface
>design.

I agree, but for a different reason from yours.

>Had I been making the decision,
>instead of SELECT PGM(MYPROG) I would have used LINK(MYPROG), and
>instead of SELECT CMD(MYCMD) I would have used ATTACH(MYCMD).

That would obscure the real difference between them. 

>And "a unique argument list format" has always baffled me.  What
>ever was wrong with R1 pointing to a vector of addresses of argument
>strings?

Noting; in fact, both forms generate such a list of addresses. The
difference is in what those addresses point to.

-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to