In <[email protected]>, on
07/25/2011
at 04:03 PM, Cheryl Walker <[email protected]> said:
>A customer may want to open a new requirement for a dynamic 'steplib'
>feature that modifies the TASKLIB for an existing command processor's
>TCB within ISPF. Such a requirement will likely be rejected by IBM
>due to concerns about security issues.
What about a request to add a tasklib for all subsequent commands?
That could be handled by the TMP without affecting existing subtasks.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
