Yes, I know. But I don't know why the OP said CS isn't working and wanted to do a SETLOCK instead. It may be that using logic with PLO instructions in a consistent manner would do what using the "simpler" CS will not. But the OP never said what he was trying to accomplish and why a CS didn't work.
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 10:06 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: > In <[email protected]>, > on 08/08/2011 > at 07:21 AM, "McKown, John" <[email protected]> said: > > >Just out of curiosity, what is your problem with CS? Perhaps PLO > >would be better? It has more functions. > > The basic rule is that all parties must use the same synchronization > technique. > -- John McKown Maranatha! <>< ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
