In <[email protected]>, on 08/09/2011
at 04:40 AM, John McKown <[email protected]> said:
>Yes, I know. But I don't know why the OP said CS isn't working and
>wanted to do a SETLOCK instead.
The OP was asking about synchronizing against existing code. IF SMF
uses the CMS lock to synchronize buffer access, then he must also use
the CMS lock to synchronize.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
