In <4e53953e.6090...@mentor-services.com>, on 08/23/2011
   at 07:55 AM, Mike Myers <m...@mentor-services.com> said:

>Yes,

No.

>Yes,  as I recall, SYNC  (SVC 12) was designed to invoke exit
>routines on behalf of system routines (like OPEN, CLOSE, etc.), 
>and therefore calls on the program by its address (found in some 
>exit list or exit pointer), 

True but irrelevant.

>whereas LINK (SVC 6) calls out a program by name (as Binyamin says)
>and was intended for calling separately compiled program 
>subroutines, which would have a CDE (either created by the LOAD or
>LINK SVC routine).

None of which prevents SYNCH from creating a CDE.
 
-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to