All right, I stand educated. ;-) . . JO.Skip Robinson SCE Infrastructure Technology Services Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 626-302-7535 Office 323-715-0595 Mobile [email protected]
From: Mark Zelden <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 09/30/2011 01:35 PM Subject: Re: AUTOIPL (was Re: Health Check (IBMSVA,SVA_AUTOIPL_DEFINED) Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:41:25 -0700, Skip Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: >OK, I stand corrected on the 'separateness' issue. I remember now trying >REIPL without having AUTOIPL set up. It didn't work at all. > >However there is obviously a difference. A vanilla VARY XCF OFF does not >invoke automatic IPL because AUTOIPL is not triggered by WAIT 0A2. 'REIPL' >must override that exception. > SKip, Because the RC matters. WAIT 0A2 RSN 004 does not trigger an SADUMP. See the doc on the WSAT for the entire table. This is why I said in my first response that IMHO there is no reason not to do the SADUMP based on the codes in the table. Unless it takes too much time in your environment (FSVO "too much time" compared to losing an SADUMP and another possible outage). Regards, Mark -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
