In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/21/2005
   at 11:16 AM, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>One can say that "IKT" messages are from both TSO and VTAM since the
>programming responsible is from VTAM development. There was a messy
>situation at one time when TSO was in some way part of TCAM and this
>programming then had to interface with VTAM. I hope I can be
>corrected by someone who recalls sufficiently far back to know
>precisely what the sequence of events was perhaps together with
>approximate dates just to satisfy the curious. (I can't help feeling
>the name TCAS has some connection with TCAM.)

VTIOC replaces TIOC, which was part of the TSO/TCAM support. TCAS was
never part of the TSO/TCAM support; it is strictly TSO/VTAM, and the T
stands for Terminal, not for TCAM.
 
-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to