Binyamin, It is true for dumping data spaces off of the current primary. I'm not quite sure why this requirement is in effect, but it is. None of the other SDUMPX parameter lists have this requirement.
Tom -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 7:32 AM To: [email protected] Subject: SDUMPX DSPLIST must be in common? The SDUMPX DSPLIST keyword is documented as requiring a pointer to an area in common storage. Is that also true if one is dumping dataspaces off of the current primary? Is there any other way to include all the dataspaces of the current primary? -- Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
