In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/23/2005
at 02:57 AM, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>As a matter of completeness the significance of the letter mentioned
>by Ray takes us back to the days of the 3274 when the "C" model was
>the link-attached SNA model, the "B" model was the channel-attached
>non-SNA model and the "D" model was another channel-attached non-SNA
>model - if my memory serves me correctly.
No, that letter goes all the way back to the 3271, 3272 and 3275, long
before the 3274. I vaguely recall that A was LU0, including BSC, B was
SNA and C was local non-SNA, but ICBW.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
