as400 wrote:
Well, thanks for this information..I really appreciate it...

And lastly, can Solaris (UNIX) be ran on a Mainframe or not? Because
you said:

" would say that most of the systems were mainframe based (IBM and
Unisys) and non-Unix based OS's:"

Please advise.


It depends on your definition of what a "mainframe" is. That I am aware of Solaris can only be run on x86 systems and systems based on Sun's Sparc processor. I have not seen a x86 system or a Sparc system labeled as a "mainframe." I have seen some advertised as "mainframe like performance" and "mainframe like relibility", but I have not (at least I do not remember any) seen Sun advertise one of their boxes as a mainframe.

If you remove the "(IBM and Unisys)" you have:

" would say that most system were mainframe based and non-Unix based OS
's".

Meaning both mainframe and non-Unix. As Solaris is Unix it does not fit in the above category. The reason for my statements is that I know that IBM is not the only company that has made mainframes and that mainframe traditionally do not run a OS that is called "Unix." You hear about people with IBM mainframes running z/OS, z/VM, etc or I have a Unisys xxx running MCP (I think that is the OS name).

The part where it starts getting confusing is that z/OS is branded "Unix", as is it predecessors (MVS with the Open Edition option and OS/390). When most people say Unix they mean things like AIX, Solaris, HP-UX, and SCO Unix. They normally do not mean z/OS.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to