On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 13:48:14 -0600, McKown, John <[email protected]> wrote:
>I'll be testing this in a couple of weekends (2011-12-18), but I'm curious >now. On z/OS 1.12, I implemented the LOGONHERE(ON) in IKJTSO00. When I do my >test IPL for z/OS 1.12 to test it in our production image, I will have both >images in the sysplex at z/OS 1.12. So I plan to also test being logged onto >TSO on both system concurrently. I don't know how it could, but I'm curious if >the LOGONHERE(ON) will interfere with being logged on to both systems at the >same time. Has anybody else done this? Oh, and I do have ISPF set up to allow >it. I think. Unless I messed up the ISPCCONF process some how. I'm still not >sure about SDSF and the console function. The people who will be logged on to >both systems concurrently are heavy SDSF users: Tech Services and Production >Control (we no longer have any operators at all). I know about the SET >CONSOLE, but am unsure of how to use it in this type of environment. We run a >basic sysplex, with no CF. So we don't have an OPERLOG, just indepe! ndent SYSLOGs in the SPOOL. > I assume you are coming from 1.10 or below? LOGONHERE(ON) was new with z/OS 1.11 and incredibly IBM chose the default as ON! (go figure). LOGONHERE is basically the same thing you always got with RECONNECT, but works when the source terminal is not the same as it was originally. In the "old days" when you worked from a real terminal or coax attached 3270 emulation, that wasn't a problem. It was for TN3270. Regards, Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:[email protected] Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
