I would expect that if you initiailize OMVS with SYSPLEX(NO) in BPXPRMxx
whatever you specify in IOEPRMxx for sysplex=xxxx would be ignored.
Mark Jacobs
On 12/12/11 11:18, Chase, John wrote:
Hi, All,
Currently studying the migration guide for z/OS 1.13 (we're running 1.11
now), and note that 1.13 delivers zFS with a default of sysplex=filesys.
Earlier releases default sysplex=off. We do NOT run any shared file
systems, and do not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future. The
migration guide says to specify sysplex=filesys on all members of the
sysplex "in a shared file system environment" before IPLing 1.13 for the
first time, but does not address running without shared file systems.
It just says that zFS will not initialize in the 1.13 system "in a
shared file system environment".
Q1: Has anyone here IPLed a z/OS 1.13 system into a "supported
back-level" sysplex WITHOUT shared file systems AND without having
specified sysplex=filesys in the "back-level" members?
Q2: What observable effect(s), if any, would occur if we specify
sysplex=filesys in our 1.11 images without sharing file systems?
TIA,
-jc-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
----
One of life's greatest mysteries is how the boy who
wasn't good enough to marry your daughter can be the
father of the smartest grandchild in the world.
Yiddish Proverb
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
