> From: "Chase, John" <[email protected]> > Subject: zFS parm sysplex=filesys
> Q1: Has anyone here IPLed a z/OS 1.13 system into a "supported > back-level" sysplex WITHOUT shared file systems AND without having > specified sysplex=filesys in the "back-level" members? We did. I already IPLed z/OS 1.13 on two of our 5 LPARs Basic Sysplex. No sysplex=filesys in IOEFSPRM, sysplex=no in BPXPRMxx. Both LPARs with z/OS 1.13 came up without any problems, the remaining 3 (at z/OS 1.11) did not complain either. > Q2: What observable effect(s), if any, would occur if we specify > sysplex=filesys in our 1.11 images without sharing file systems? Honestly, I didn't tried. I would think that sysplex=no takes precedence over sysplex=filesys, but again, it is only my assumption. Walter Marguccio z/OS Systems Programmer BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH Munich - Germany ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
