In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/30/2005
at 11:35 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Is there, then, no SIOT for dynamically allocated data sets?
Not that I'm aware of; I believe that the relevant data are in the
DSAB.
>Does SVC 99 at some point invoke Interpreter code to construct a
>SIOT?
Absolutely not.
>How are the syntactic rules for catalogued data sets enforced for
>dynamic allocation?
Presumably by SVC 26 or SMS.
>Or is this the basis for Bruce's observation
>that they can be bypassed by an assembler program?
Presumably the basis was trying it and seeing what happened.
>(May I assume that Bruce wasn't cheating by running his test in a
>privileged state?)
I wouldn't consider that cheating, and I don't know how many distinct
tests he ran. For all I know he could have a whole suite of tests to
catch SMS changes that affect FDR.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
