On 01/23/2012 10:09 AM, Staller, Allan wrote:
Generally speaking...Yes

<snip>
IOW, the response time is more likely to increase than to decrease,
and increased response time is a Bad Thing
</snip>


PAV, Cache, and RAID all have impacts that mitigate the 1:3 (or worse)
actuator to data ratio on mod 9 vs. 3 mod 3.
These impacts may not be part of the intended design.

As with most things, YMMV. Few large datasets are less impacted than
many small datasets.

...
With PAV, if you use PAVs to give the same total number of addresses to the mod 9 as were previously on the three mod-3's it replaces, you could conceivably even get better response from lower IOSQ time from the merging of available PAVs of three volumes into a single pool (unless you are already getting this benefit from Hiper-PAV support)

Without appropriately configured PAV, the result is an unknown. Depending on how heavy the concurrent loading of the original mod-3's, you could have anywhere from severe IOSQ delays and response problems to inconsequential IOSQ delays and minimal increase in response time.

While it may be easier to conceive of many concurrent users on a volume with many small datasets, large multi-volume sequential datasets can easily have high concurrent usage on different volumes from readers in multiple critical batch workloads; and large VSAM datasets, as in this case, could easily have a large amount of concurrent access on multiple volumes from concurrent on-line transactions and/or from multiple batch workloads. In such cases, merging the independent loads from three drives to one without adequate PAV addresses could easily introduce significant to severe device busy usage and IOSQ delay times. Without knowing something about the concurrent 3390-3 volume usage patterns, response time on 3390-9 without PAVs is a crapshoot even with only a single large VSAM dataset.
--
Joel C. Ewing,    Bentonville, AR       [email protected] 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to