In <[email protected]>, on
02/17/2012
at 11:02 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:
>It would seem to me that when the time came to convert from 3330 to
>3350 (e.g.), the simple path would have been to replace "TRK" with
>"13030"
That would have left a lot of slack. Possibly that would have been a
good thing.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
