On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:01:50 -0500, Walt Farrell <walt.farr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:42:32 +0000, Gibney, Dave <gib...@wsu.edu> wrote: > >>I'll bite. Hi, Walt, What makes you think IBM might listen to this now that >>you are not there? These jobs have always been a mess. >> >>Last time I ranted, I suggested that serverpac provide an unload (or unload >>records of the required profiles that could be used with DBSYNC (A very >>useful tool, thank you so much) to more closely approximate the updates >>needed to a customer specific RACF DB. >>I think Russ, or someone took the idea under advisement. > >My presence (or absence) should have no effect, Dave. I was part of the RACF >team, not the ServerPac team. They have complete responsibility for the >configuration jobs they ship. > >If no one complains to them, they won't know anyone has a problem. > Right. And complaints / rants on IBM-MAIN or other forums aren't official and usually don't do any good (sometimes it does help if someone involved monitors that forum). The problem is most people want to leave the complaints / opening of PMRs for "annoyances" to someone else and they just move along hoping it will get fixed on its own. Human nature I suppose, I often do it too. I just depends on how annoying an annoying problem is. :-) Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:m...@mzelden.com Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
