In a recent note, Knutson, Sam said:
> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:57:56 -0500
>
> Move away from using TSO to submit jobs and monitor work using products
> like E(JES) or just native z/OS FTP. There seem to be a lot of people
> doing that out there.
>
> http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/EJES/ejes.htm
>
Ed Jaffe has mentioned this here previously:
Linkname: Re: TSO alternative
URL:
http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0311&L=ibm-main&D=1&O=D&I=1&P=129615
I know that some z/OS.e installations use our (E)JES/2 product
for this purpose. It provides, among other things, a (virtually)
unlimited number of GUI ISPF sessions, an environment considered
more than adequate for most z/OS.e users.
I don't know about price, but for ISPGUI it's easy enough to RYO.
I did this once, launching ISPGUI from a batch job submitted via
FTP (it could as well have been submitted from a z/OS Unix shell).
I lost interest when the graphic interface of ISPGUI disappointed
me -- we don't suffer a TSO users limitation.
> http://www.wright.edu/cats/docs/docroom/mainframe/mvsftp.htm
>
> http://www.its.niu.edu/its/CSupport/ftp-mvs.shtml
>
> http://www.technion.ac.il/guides/tcc-guides/Guides/submjob.htm
>
> http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/MVS/MVS-JESFTP-1.1.readme
>
> http://www.naspa.com/PDF/2003/0603/T0306004.pdf
>
> http://cirt.unm.edu/howtos/ht264.html
-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
