So far complaints on the new verbose behavior seem to have come from folks 
who are not yet running R13. The ESP customers who induced the change were 
already immersed in R13 and knew first hand how *useless* verbose messages 
are in syslog/operlog. Does everyone understand that verbose messages are 
nothing but chunks of prose lifted from the message manual? They are not 
sophisticated diagnostic guides that might provide unique insight into 
solving a particular abend. They just save you a trip to your favorite doc 
library. Over and over ad nauseam. 

These endlessly repetitive annotations clutter up syslog/operlog. Flotsam 
and jetsam that we can all live better with in a location closer to the 
actual problem. 

.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE Infrastructure Technology Services
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com



From:   "W. Kevin Kelley" <wkkel...@optonline.net>
To:     IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:   05/06/2012 06:04 PM
Subject:        Re: Comments on DFSMS verbose messages?
Sent by:        IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu>



Mark,

You are correct -- there is now no option to put the additional lines of 
explanation in the SYSLOG/OPERLOG. We reacted to what we heard from the 
ESP customers, and to quote you perhaps they "overreacted". That is why I 
put the post out here, to hear what other people think.

W. Kevin Kelley -- IBM POK Lab -- z/OS Core Technical Development



----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to