My question is: if you are happy with Shark why are you looking to switch.
If it is just financial you should be able to leverage the discussions that
you are having with Storage Tek in your negotiations with IBM.
Joel Wolpert
Director - Performance and Capacity Planning
Shared Data Center
Securities Industry Automation Corporation
2 Metrotech Center
New York, NY 11201
(212) 383-3323
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hal Merritt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RY.COM> To
Sent by: IBM [email protected]
Mainframe cc
Discussion List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
.edu> StorageTek DASD?
01/17/2006 03:14
PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe
Discussion List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.edu>
We are looking at the StorageTek 'V series' DASD as a possible upgrade
path, We are currently one local and one remote 2105-800 Shark
interconnected with PPRC XD. We are heavy PAV and some Flashcopy II. The
other site is currently inactive (BR only), but our strategic direction
is twin sites, each being the other's offsite backup.
Total farm size 2-4 tb. We must have the sub millisecond response time
we now enjoy with the Shark. And the Sharks' reliability/fault tolerance
has been important.
Any thoughts, suggestions, words of wisdom? And experiences you would be
willing to share?
-----------------------------------------
This message and its attachments may contain privileged and
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
you are prohibited from printing, forwarding, saving or copying this
email. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
notify the sender and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your
computer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
