On Jan 19, 2006, at 5:35 AM, Bruce Hewson wrote:

Hello Ed,

Date formats can not be assumed. And this was extract from IBM SIS site.

I read it as yy/mm/dd = 2002 August 26,

I know this but it was a lame attempt at humor. There is always talk on here about the graying of us sysprogs.
Sorry.


Ed


On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:17:38 -0600, Ed Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Jan 17, 2006, at 11:17 PM, Bruce Hewson wrote:

Hello Victor,

Have you checked your SMF TYPE 19 collection as per Shane and Sam's
posts?

Check out Info APAR:

  APAR Identifier ...... II02887      Last Changed ........ 02/08/26
  SMF SWITCH COMMAND DOES NOT COMPLETE IN A TIMELY MANNER OR
  IPL DOES NOT COMPLETE IN TIMELY MANNER - WAITING ON SHARED DASD

Bruce,

1926 ???!!! even MVS is not that old.

Ed



Regards
Bruce

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to