On Jan 19, 2006, at 5:35 AM, Bruce Hewson wrote:
Hello Ed,
Date formats can not be assumed. And this was extract from IBM SIS
site.
I read it as yy/mm/dd = 2002 August 26,
I know this but it was a lame attempt at humor. There is always
talk on here about the graying of us sysprogs.
Sorry.
Ed
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:17:38 -0600, Ed Gould
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 17, 2006, at 11:17 PM, Bruce Hewson wrote:
Hello Victor,
Have you checked your SMF TYPE 19 collection as per Shane and Sam's
posts?
Check out Info APAR:
APAR Identifier ...... II02887 Last Changed ........ 02/08/26
SMF SWITCH COMMAND DOES NOT COMPLETE IN A TIMELY MANNER OR
IPL DOES NOT COMPLETE IN TIMELY MANNER - WAITING ON SHARED DASD
Bruce,
1926 ???!!! even MVS is not that old.
Ed
Regards
Bruce
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html