In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/20/2006
at 03:44 AM, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>But, but, but a VTAM application can access SSCP-LU functions for
>session termination through the TERMSESS macro. What it cannot do is
>define itself to VTAM as being able to send USS commands to the SSCP
>and receive USS messages.
Is USS part of the SSCP or is it a separate service? Normally you
communicate with the SSCP by sending a formatted Request/Response (RR)
unit, or issuing an equivalent VTAM macro. What do you wan to do that
can't be done with an appropriate formatted RR unit?
>Combining TERMSESS capability and USS table support, the same USS
>service can be offered to a TN3270E client as TN3270E server logic
>with USS passthrough capability does also for LOGOFF support. This
>would incidentally necessarily include support for USS messages -
>including the famous USS message 5.
Passthrough of what? Why?
>My proposal is that the CS IP TELNET server should behave as if it
>was also for LOGOFF support.
That doesn't require passthrough of USS commands.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
