> IMHO, the new "kid" on the block -- this 'CAZ' product from IBM -- ought > to choose a component ID that doesn't conflict with an *extremely* > popular product from CA with a decades long history and many thousands > of happy customers; probably including IBM themselves...
I would certainly agree with that sentiment. My (somewhat terse) earlier post was not intended otherwise, but on re-reading it could be interpreted that way. There are quite a few examples of other ISV products that have been "grandfathered" into the IBM namespace - our own BB* stuff for example. However, IBM provides a registry for these things and as far as I know, they will not assign an internal TLA that conflicts with a registered ISV product - even if that product is in the IBM namespace. CC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
