> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Peterson
> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:04 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: 3490 mount POD display problem?
> 
> 
> I believe there are two separate components that can issue 
> the CCW command
> which causes the display on the 3490 tape drive.
> 
> Allocation:     5752SC1B4
> Open/Close/EOV: 5695DF107
> 
> Here's what I would do:  Try to get specific examples of 
> mounts where the
> message is missing.  Were they associated with mount message IEF233A -
> that's Alocation.  Were they associated with IEC501A - that's
> Open/Close/EOV.
> 
> If you find that all examples the operators come up with are 
> Allocation,
> open a PMR with Allocation.  If Open/Close/EOV, then OCE.  If 
> both, then
> perhaps it might be a hardware problem.
> 
> Just a suggestion - hope it helps!
> 
> Brian

Thanks. Too bad our tape operators tend to get the "deer in the head
lights" look when you try to "talk techie" to them. I cannot blame them,
tho. We are planning to eliminate the position of tape operator
completely (ATL + VTS replacing them). All the current tape operators
will be print operators only (they are "dual purpose" right now), so
nobody will be "let go" (like people were trying to get away?).

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
UICI Insurance Center
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited. 
 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to