I saw that too, from Cheryl's list. But if they don't, IBM's document that I referred to is incorrect. It says that both the 10x and the 1Cx models have a 1.3 nanosecond cycle time and the 2Cx and 21x models have a 1.09 nanosecond cycle time. Maybe IBM did something different in building the blocks or memory interleaving or something to get the additional boost.
Ideas, anybody? Rex <snip> >These machines have the same clock speed as the 101-109 line. Actually, they don't. A 101 is 235 MIPS-like entities. A 1C1 is 250. - -teD I'm an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in! </snip> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
