Robert Rosenberg writes
Isn't a WTL just a WTO ROUTECDE=11 under the covers? If so, why would it
function
differently (unless the original WTO was not being explicitly being
routed to 11?).
a comment that is gratuitous in the light of my original language,
I have found that using WTLs instead of WTOs in these circumstances helps
much more than
there would seem to be any reason to believe that it should
which he quotes apparently without understanding it.
Like most of the old men in this business, I had always used MNOTE '<text>'
statements for assembly-time messages to myself and WTO foir execution-time
ones until I observed one oof my students using WTLs instead of WTOs. I
asked her why; she produced a small study establishing that WTLs are indeed
significantly, even very much faster in many circumstances; and I began to
use them too.
John Gilmore
Ashland, MA 01721-1817
USA
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
