In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 04/16/2006
at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>Are you drunk,
>That's it!
>When you cannot tackle the argument, tackle the arguer.
Humor is such a subtle thing! Youi failed to note that you had just
done the same thing to me.
>That is one of the most insulting comments I have ever heard from a
>so-called professional.
Really? I don't think that it was any more insulting than "Or, are you
just obsfuscating your error with baffle-gab?". I wonder who wrote
that?
>You obviously did not want to see my point.
What point? That I believed in an imaginary errors? That I was
obfuscating my imaginary belief in that imaginary error?
>Not everybody is as learned and professional as you, Seymour. Not
>everybody knows everything, like you do!
But some of them can ask for clarification or express disagreement
without claiming that I am dishonest.
>I was actually repeating comments
That's usually a mistake when you haven't taken the trouble to verify
tat the comments are correct. Of course, I have no reason to believe
that you were accurately repeating the comments.
BTW, try using cat to display a PDF ;-)
>At the University of Waterloo, in the mid-1970's, they actually
>created aliases of the so-called intuitive commands, with meaningful
>names.
>But, then they weren't the experts like you!
You clearly know nothing about me. I too have created alias and
abbreviation lists when I found it expedient. --
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
