In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/24/2006
at 02:26 AM, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I think the text you found logically, if not chronologically,
>precedes the introduction of the type 2.1 node and the introduction
>of the "control point" as the entity managing the node rather than
>always the PU.
Chronologically, which is why I made sure to mention that it was old.
But the PUCP was already there. If you have a recent FAPL manual, is
there a section on nomenclature around p I-8?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
