> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Andrews
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:04 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Dataset contention on GDG
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 14:07 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
> > I think it is so that when a job starts, that the
> > relative generation number always maps to the same absolute 
> generation
> 
> The initiator maintains the "GDG name table" (I think that's it) which
> is a series of SWA control blocks queued off the JCT.  Each control
> block has eyecatcher "GDGN" and holds up to three entries: a 
> 35-byte GDG
> base name and a four-byte base generation number.  "+0" refers to this
> base generation number throughout the job's execution.
> 
> -- 
> David Andrews

I am aware of the GDG bias number. However, I think what that is used
for is so that if the job creates a +1 (or some other + generation) in a
step, it knows to adjust the minus numbers (and zero) in subsequent
steps. E.g. after a step creates a +1, that absolute generation is now
really +0 according to the catalog. So a later step which references +0
has that number adjusted by the GDG bias number to become, in this case,
the -1 generation during catalog lookup.

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited. 
 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to